The Nature of Evidence

I recently had a conversation with someone about the nature of evidence. He was asking me why we don’t have this or why we don’t have that? These were good questions and I’m glad he asked them because it sparked something in my mind. In apologetic conversations, it often drifts toward the evidence we want. I argue that we need to shift from that and look to the evidence we would expect.

Let us begin with the example of the existence of God. What is the evidence we would like? It would be great if when we looked at Mars that we saw a message “I am God and I exist” written in every human language. Although even that would not be proof of God’s existence, it would be nice. Or if when we looked at microorganisms that we saw a “Made by God” message. That is the kind of evidence we would want. But what kind of evidence would we expect if there were a God? We would expect there to be a beginning to the universe. We would expect there to be evidence of intelligent design, both in the nature of the universe and in the lifeforms that exist. We would expect there to be some sort of revelation from that God to humanity. I’m not sure that we would expect more if there was a God.

What about the existence of Jesus? I have heard many say that if Jesus existed, there should be a multitude of Jewish and Roman accounts of his life. We should have the court records. We should have written accounts of the Jews that heard him preach. We should have accounts by the Pharisees and Sadducees giving a hostile account of Jesus. I agree that this is the kind of evidence I would like to see. If these were found in some cave, I would be as happy as anyone. But that is the evidence we would like. What about the evidence we would expect? Since many of the people who heard Jesus preach either could not write or could not afford paper, we would not expect anything from them. The Romans did not care about some religious leader in a backwater province, so we would not expect anything from them. As for the Pharisees and the Sadducees, we don’t have anything from them from the first century, so we should not be surprised that they fail to mention Jesus. What would we expect? We would expect that there would be some biographies and letters by the followers of Jesus. We would expect a short mention by Josephus. But that is about it.

The point is when people ask why certain types of evidence are missing, we must shift the conversation from the evidence we want to the evidence we would expect.

Liked it? Take a second to support Stephen Bedard on Patreon!

4 thoughts on “The Nature of Evidence”

  1. Evidence we want vs. evidence we’d expect. I really like your points here! I blog on faith and doubt and “evidence” type concerns. I will re-blog this!

    1. What evidence would be considered passable for a man god that performed miracles over a two year period including, but not limited to, curing blindness, walking on water, altering the weather, and last but no means least raising the dead, including himself?

      All of which were unattested by any other than the suspect writers of the new testament.
      And this of course not withstanding the claim in G John that we could probably fill a tome with all the unrecorded miracles JC performed.

      And while this was happening, not a single non biblical character took the slightest bit of notice.

      So whole JC was wandering the land curing everything from dandruff to death and his acts were witnessed by multitudes, noone saw fit to place a really tight guard on his tomb.

      The Romans, who had just put JC to death for sedition amid ALL these other fantastic rumours about his supernatural capabilities; and being somewhat overawed by a plethora of gods did not think it prudent to have a few centurions standing by just in case?

      It takes a truly inculcated mind to accept this without almost no question.

      Fortunately, common sense does occasionally come to the rescue.

  2. Your point makes so much sense that I wonder why I haven’t heard (or thought) of it before! Thank you for articulating it clearly and giving me something new to think about.

    (I found your post through Laura at Enough Light. I like to let bloggers know how I found them.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.