The Jesus Movements

Deconstructing jesusIn the second chapter of Deconstructing Jesus, Price continues to attempt a picture of the earliest church that differed on major issues.

Price makes much of Q, the hypothetical document that contains sayings common to Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark. I don’t have a problem with Q (listen to this podcast episode I did on the synoptic problem). It is possible that Q existed in some form but we must be careful not to try and describe with any confidence the theology of that community. Price claims that the Q community did not believe in the resurrection because Q never mentions it. However, we don’t know if Q mentioned it since we do not have Q. All we can say is that Matthew and Luke did not use Q for their resurrection narrative. Even if Q didn’t mention the resurrection, as a sayings gospel, we shouldn’t expect a resurrection narrative.

Price then tries to reconstruct (relying on Burton Mack) a Christian community separate from Paul that included the pillars (Peter, John and James) and the heirs (family) of Jesus. This is very creative but is far from required from a reading of the New Testament. It makes perfect sense that there was a community led by the pillars in Jerusalem that had the same doctrine as Paul.

This chapter comes across more as a study of Burton Mack than of the New Testament. It is not convincing in its attempt that the earliest Christians had different beliefs than what became orthodox Christianity.




Liked it? Take a second to support Stephen Bedard on Patreon!
Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.